Is AVMA recall update missing the point?
By Christie Keith
January 14, 2010
So, is the AVMA’s take on the ketamine recall new information, a clarification, or spin?
A few minutes ago, I followed a tweet by @AVMAvets that read:
Butorphanol NOT affected by ketamine recall
The included link took me to an update on the AVMA website, which said:
Butorphanol is not affected by the expanded ketamine recall. Several butorphanol products manufactured by Teva Animal Health, Inc. were recalled as a precautionary measure at the distributor level in September 2009. Neither Teva Animal Health, Inc. nor the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine has observed an increasing trend of adverse event reports associated with the use of these butorphanol products that would justify further action beyond the initial precautionary recall in September.
It is true that butorphanol has not been recalled beyond the distributor level, as ketamine has been. And it’s true, or at least, true as far as we know, that there have been no reports of adverse events associated with the recalled butorphanol.
Indeed, even the five cats whose deaths triggered the Dec. 22 ketamine recall and Dec. 29 expansion of that recall may not have died due to ketamine. We don’t know.
What we do know is this: Teva Animal Health, Inc. was shut down by the FDA on July 31 for a long list of problems (PDF) with their drugs, including “foreign material floating in” another injectable medication, non-sterile water used to formulate drugs, improperly formulated gentamicin sulfate (an antibiotic) and numerous other failures to properly manufacture drugs, including levothyroxine sodium, a thyroid supplement.
From that moment on, the FDA ordered them not to sell or distribute their drugs any more, to anyone.
On Sept. 4, Teva sent a letter to its distributors and recalled butorphanol and ketamine that they had in stock. This letter, entitled “Urgent Drug Recall,” instructed them to “cease distribution” of these drugs and stated that the FDA was aware of the recall.
Teva also told its distributors that they could recall product from the customers to whom they’d sold it — veterinarians — but it wasn’t required that they do so.
And they didn’t.
So I have a question for the AVMA: Don’t you think your member veterinarians should have been given this information about this “urgent drug recall” back in September, when the distributors were, and allowed to decide for themselves?
Why do the distributors get the “precautionary measure” of a recall, but not the veterinarians who are the ones giving these drugs to their patients?
Not to mention that I believe I have a right to know if my veterinarian is giving my pet recalled drugs from a company shut down by the FDA for adulterated drugs and bad manufacturing practices. I have a sneaking suspicion my veterinarian feels the same way.
Don’t you?
The amazing story of Druse the Dachshund: Although I have two longhaired dachshunds, I am not the type to proclaim them the best of all possible breeds. Every dog is unique, just like us. However, loyal reader Snoopy’s Friend found a


