<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging No More Homeless Pets Conference: Opening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/</link>
	<description>Blogging by a team of pet-care experts led by Dr. Marty Becker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:56:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: K.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477365</link>
		<dc:creator>K.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477365</guid>
		<description>I know of a breeder of a small terrier breed.  She&#039;s an AKC earthdog judge, brags about how her dogs can &quot;to what they are bred to do&quot; (i.e. kill vermin), has all the correct clauses in her contracts, asks the right questions, takes her dogs back, etc. etc. etc.

She also, very loudly, insists that luxating patellas are just a &quot;vet scam&quot; and it&#039;s &quot;normal for dogs to have bad knees&quot;.

Just goes to show, there is no complete list to separate &quot;good&quot; from &quot;bad&quot; when it comes to breeders.  There is, however, a list every potential dog owner should have *for themselves* that they judge all breeders against.  I know what&#039;s on MY list for the breed I&#039;m interested in, and if I was getting a dog from a shelter/rescue, I&#039;d have a list for that as well (especially important, IMO, for private rescues, some of which I&#039;m certain are just fronts for puppy mills).

The best thing - figure out what&#039;s important to you (and at a minimum, it should be health testing, even for &quot;hybrid&quot; dogs), and find a breeder that fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know of a breeder of a small terrier breed.  She&#8217;s an AKC earthdog judge, brags about how her dogs can &#8220;to what they are bred to do&#8221; (i.e. kill vermin), has all the correct clauses in her contracts, asks the right questions, takes her dogs back, etc. etc. etc.</p>
<p>She also, very loudly, insists that luxating patellas are just a &#8220;vet scam&#8221; and it&#8217;s &#8220;normal for dogs to have bad knees&#8221;.</p>
<p>Just goes to show, there is no complete list to separate &#8220;good&#8221; from &#8220;bad&#8221; when it comes to breeders.  There is, however, a list every potential dog owner should have *for themselves* that they judge all breeders against.  I know what&#8217;s on MY list for the breed I&#8217;m interested in, and if I was getting a dog from a shelter/rescue, I&#8217;d have a list for that as well (especially important, IMO, for private rescues, some of which I&#8217;m certain are just fronts for puppy mills).</p>
<p>The best thing - figure out what&#8217;s important to you (and at a minimum, it should be health testing, even for &#8220;hybrid&#8221; dogs), and find a breeder that fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477361</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477361</guid>
		<description>&quot;rule out&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;rule out&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477360</guid>
		<description>Just goes to show, any single criteria you set, a really terrible puppymiller has met it somewhere.

----

But wouldn&#039;t lifetime take-back rule of most of the millers?

And I wouldn&#039;t stop at that, but it&#039;s a simple way for the average consumer to start comparison shopping.

&quot;responsible&quot; breeder is so vague. In fact, it&#039;s only since I started reading this blog that I believed there could be such a thing.

&quot;lifetime take-back&quot; I can measure and observe.

Like healthful food. (tangent: not &quot;healthy&quot; food! gah!) What does that mean? Oh, I can just look at the nutrition label. I&#039;m avoiding sodium for health reasons so I&#039;ll skip this snack. But my mom needs more sodium, so for her it IS healthful as per the label. Observable, measurable, EASY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just goes to show, any single criteria you set, a really terrible puppymiller has met it somewhere.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>But wouldn&#8217;t lifetime take-back rule of most of the millers?</p>
<p>And I wouldn&#8217;t stop at that, but it&#8217;s a simple way for the average consumer to start comparison shopping.</p>
<p>&#8220;responsible&#8221; breeder is so vague. In fact, it&#8217;s only since I started reading this blog that I believed there could be such a thing.</p>
<p>&#8220;lifetime take-back&#8221; I can measure and observe.</p>
<p>Like healthful food. (tangent: not &#8220;healthy&#8221; food! gah!) What does that mean? Oh, I can just look at the nutrition label. I&#8217;m avoiding sodium for health reasons so I&#8217;ll skip this snack. But my mom needs more sodium, so for her it IS healthful as per the label. Observable, measurable, EASY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. Houlahan</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477358</link>
		<dc:creator>H. Houlahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477358</guid>
		<description>There were at least two bitches confiscated from Shady Lane kennels in December who had been sold as pups and then at some point returned.  They were pretty social, and they were spayed.  Their convicted owner confirmed that they were both returns.  (I mean, &lt;i&gt;nobody&lt;/i&gt; got spayed there.  That would have meant going to the &lt;i&gt;vet&lt;/i&gt; and spending &lt;i&gt;money&lt;/i&gt;)

I can only hope that the people who returned dogs to that woman were fully hoodwinked innocents who had no idea what they were sending them back to.  Because anyone who actually drove up and gave back a dog, seeing what there was to see, had better hide.

Just goes to show, any single criteria you set, a really terrible puppymiller has met it somewhere.

I&#039;m for a gestalt of multiple criteria.  Harder to explain, but more accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were at least two bitches confiscated from Shady Lane kennels in December who had been sold as pups and then at some point returned.  They were pretty social, and they were spayed.  Their convicted owner confirmed that they were both returns.  (I mean, <i>nobody</i> got spayed there.  That would have meant going to the <i>vet</i> and spending <i>money</i>)</p>
<p>I can only hope that the people who returned dogs to that woman were fully hoodwinked innocents who had no idea what they were sending them back to.  Because anyone who actually drove up and gave back a dog, seeing what there was to see, had better hide.</p>
<p>Just goes to show, any single criteria you set, a really terrible puppymiller has met it somewhere.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m for a gestalt of multiple criteria.  Harder to explain, but more accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477357</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477357</guid>
		<description>Look, I said it didn&#039;t cover ALL the breeders, but you have to realize, some of the people who say that to you are really people who are too embarrassed to admit to the breeder that they&#039;re re-homing the dog -- or who rightly fear they&#039;ll be judged and scolded for doing so -- and make up a story, or embellish one, about how bad the conditions are at the breeder&#039;s place. Because most (not all, again) breeders who have this kind of guarantee would never let their dogs suffer or live in squalor. The two things don&#039;t tend to go together. Breeders who don&#039;t care about the dogs they own also don&#039;t care about the dogs they breed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I said it didn&#8217;t cover ALL the breeders, but you have to realize, some of the people who say that to you are really people who are too embarrassed to admit to the breeder that they&#8217;re re-homing the dog &#8212; or who rightly fear they&#8217;ll be judged and scolded for doing so &#8212; and make up a story, or embellish one, about how bad the conditions are at the breeder&#8217;s place. Because most (not all, again) breeders who have this kind of guarantee would never let their dogs suffer or live in squalor. The two things don&#8217;t tend to go together. Breeders who don&#8217;t care about the dogs they own also don&#8217;t care about the dogs they breed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477356</guid>
		<description>Christie,
Thanks for that. OK. 

&quot;Lifetime Take-back Breeder.&quot;

Clunky? A bit. 
Clear? Yes.
Concise? Yes.

I like it.

HOWEVER ... I&#039;ve met breeders (not of dogs, so this may not be relevant) who will take back the animals, but then make them live in the same poor conditions the parents live in. So the buyers don&#039;t WANT to take them back there. Instead they call ME, to bring their pets to my rescue. Which I don&#039;t have.

I had a breeder tell me her buyers don&#039;t give up their pets because she only sells to people from good neighborhoods.

But I digress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christie,<br />
Thanks for that. OK. </p>
<p>&#8220;Lifetime Take-back Breeder.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clunky? A bit.<br />
Clear? Yes.<br />
Concise? Yes.</p>
<p>I like it.</p>
<p>HOWEVER &#8230; I&#8217;ve met breeders (not of dogs, so this may not be relevant) who will take back the animals, but then make them live in the same poor conditions the parents live in. So the buyers don&#8217;t WANT to take them back there. Instead they call ME, to bring their pets to my rescue. Which I don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>I had a breeder tell me her buyers don&#8217;t give up their pets because she only sells to people from good neighborhoods.</p>
<p>But I digress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LauraS</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477354</link>
		<dc:creator>LauraS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477354</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth Oreck previously listed her title as &quot;Campaign Manager, California Healthy Pets Act (AB 1634)&quot;.  

Elizabeth Oreck isn&#039;t just a supporter of mandatory spay/neuter, she has been one of the primary lobbyists for mandatory spay/neuter in California.  

MichelleD asks &quot;How can someone on the ground in LA be THIS out of touch?&quot;

How&#039;s this for &quot;out of touch&quot; from Ms. Oreck:
&quot;the opposition [to AB 1634] is primarily comprised of hunters, circuses, the NRA, vivisectors (all of whom do not want to see any animal rights legislation), and the AKC (who make money on every animal they register, so again, this is a profit issue for them).&quot;
http://www.waccobb.net/forums/pets-other-critters/25620-can-you-give-some-time-solving-couple-problems.html#post37166</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Oreck previously listed her title as &#8220;Campaign Manager, California Healthy Pets Act (AB 1634)&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Elizabeth Oreck isn&#8217;t just a supporter of mandatory spay/neuter, she has been one of the primary lobbyists for mandatory spay/neuter in California.  </p>
<p>MichelleD asks &#8220;How can someone on the ground in LA be THIS out of touch?&#8221;</p>
<p>How&#8217;s this for &#8220;out of touch&#8221; from Ms. Oreck:<br />
&#8220;the opposition [to AB 1634] is primarily comprised of hunters, circuses, the NRA, vivisectors (all of whom do not want to see any animal rights legislation), and the AKC (who make money on every animal they register, so again, this is a profit issue for them).&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.waccobb.net/forums/pets-other-critters/25620-can-you-give-some-time-solving-couple-problems.html#post37166" rel="nofollow">http://www.waccobb.net/forums/.....#post37166</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477351</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477351</guid>
		<description>I have long said there&#039;s a very good litmus test for a good vs bad breeder, which is: Does the breeder guarantee, in writing, that she or he will take the dog back at any time in the dog&#039;s lifetime, for any reason, no questions asked?

While there is a LOT more to what makes a &quot;good breeder,&quot; the answer to this single question is going to weed out 99 percent of the bad ones. It won&#039;t guarantee your dog will be well-bred, well-behaved, or healthy; dogs are living creatures and you can&#039;t guarantee that of any living creature, and furthermore, someone can be very ethical and caring and still do a bad job with their genetic breeding decisions and husbandry, just as someone can be a very kind, loving person and be a terrible accountant or knitter or gardener.

But if your goal is to see if a breeder is ethical or not, the lifetime safety net is a damn good indicator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long said there&#8217;s a very good litmus test for a good vs bad breeder, which is: Does the breeder guarantee, in writing, that she or he will take the dog back at any time in the dog&#8217;s lifetime, for any reason, no questions asked?</p>
<p>While there is a LOT more to what makes a &#8220;good breeder,&#8221; the answer to this single question is going to weed out 99 percent of the bad ones. It won&#8217;t guarantee your dog will be well-bred, well-behaved, or healthy; dogs are living creatures and you can&#8217;t guarantee that of any living creature, and furthermore, someone can be very ethical and caring and still do a bad job with their genetic breeding decisions and husbandry, just as someone can be a very kind, loving person and be a terrible accountant or knitter or gardener.</p>
<p>But if your goal is to see if a breeder is ethical or not, the lifetime safety net is a damn good indicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Spadafori</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477349</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Spadafori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477349</guid>
		<description>How to avoid a bad breeder is a very hard concept to get our arms around enough to communicate, as we can see in the recent comments here on another post. This lady getting her &quot;hybrid&quot; &quot;Maltipoo&quot; is more than likely buying from a puppy mill. The signs are all there. But she&#039;s convinced she&#039;s in good hands -- even though she is having the puppy sent to her like a Lands End parka. 

Wish her the best, but ... if I were putting my money down, I&#039;d bet on luxating patelas, collapsing trachea, liver shunts, poor temperament, impossible to house-train from being used to living in crap -- and continued business for the puppy-miller, which means that puppy&#039;s mom and dad continue to live in hell so they can continue to produce more &quot;inventory.&quot;

If she asked my opinion -- which she didn&#039;t -- I&#039;d tell her to run like hell. But she seems to be going forward in denial, so I hope at least she gets a good vet, pet health insurance and a good dog trainer to help with the behavior issues. 

That puppy&#039;s parents? Well, they&#039;re just screwed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to avoid a bad breeder is a very hard concept to get our arms around enough to communicate, as we can see in the recent comments here on another post. This lady getting her &#8220;hybrid&#8221; &#8220;Maltipoo&#8221; is more than likely buying from a puppy mill. The signs are all there. But she&#8217;s convinced she&#8217;s in good hands &#8212; even though she is having the puppy sent to her like a Lands End parka. </p>
<p>Wish her the best, but &#8230; if I were putting my money down, I&#8217;d bet on luxating patelas, collapsing trachea, liver shunts, poor temperament, impossible to house-train from being used to living in crap &#8212; and continued business for the puppy-miller, which means that puppy&#8217;s mom and dad continue to live in hell so they can continue to produce more &#8220;inventory.&#8221;</p>
<p>If she asked my opinion &#8212; which she didn&#8217;t &#8212; I&#8217;d tell her to run like hell. But she seems to be going forward in denial, so I hope at least she gets a good vet, pet health insurance and a good dog trainer to help with the behavior issues. </p>
<p>That puppy&#8217;s parents? Well, they&#8217;re just screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/10/23/liveblogging-no-more-homeless-pets-conference-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-477347</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=9697#comment-477347</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Christie. For as much as this topic has been discussed on this blog, I don&#039;t think we are anywhere near the &quot;soundbite&quot; compare/contrast I think the cause needs. Yes, we have some gains, like petstore=puppy mill, and if your website shows that you produce 10 different dog breeds you are most likely a mill (I&#039;m sure someone will argue with me there). So I&#039;m eager to see if Elizabeth is approaching that in describing the &quot;good&quot; breeder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Christie. For as much as this topic has been discussed on this blog, I don&#8217;t think we are anywhere near the &#8220;soundbite&#8221; compare/contrast I think the cause needs. Yes, we have some gains, like petstore=puppy mill, and if your website shows that you produce 10 different dog breeds you are most likely a mill (I&#8217;m sure someone will argue with me there). So I&#8217;m eager to see if Elizabeth is approaching that in describing the &#8220;good&#8221; breeder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
