<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed federal law: Prove your pets are safe, or we&#8217;ll ban them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/</link>
	<description>Blogging by a team of pet-care experts led by Dr. Marty Becker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:54:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia L. Reese</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-2/#comment-453256</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia L. Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-453256</guid>
		<description>I have been a long time owner of iguanas, small snakes, horses, dogs, cats, gerbils, + birds.

My opinion as to what animals should be banned to own by the average person, I believe that all constricting snakes, such as pythons, + boas, as well as all poisonous snakes should NOT be allowed to be kept in a home. I also believe that all of these type of snakes, as well as gila monsters, or any other poisonous reptiles should not be kept by any average person at home.

The ONLY persons that should be allowed to have these dangerous animals is a herpetologist, a zoo, or a person that milks a snake for it&#039;s venom, to make
antivenin. The only time that these animals should be kept is under strict rules, + only with a permit. These snakes have NO reason to be in someone&#039;s home, under ANY circumstances. They should always be in appropriate secure facility to guarantee prevention of escape.

As to protecting the environment from all foreign animals, if the paperwork was kept as for where, these animals go, + if to a pet shop, the paperwork should also reflect who purchased the animal, so that if the animal is found loose, it will be proof of the owner releasing the animal, + then that owner should be held accountable, + severely fined. If they can afford to purchase such an animal, they can afford the fines, if the animal causes damage to our environment.

It seems we should give each animal a microchip when it is brought into our country, then it will have a permanent no., so it can be kept track of no matter where in the U.S. that it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a long time owner of iguanas, small snakes, horses, dogs, cats, gerbils, + birds.</p>
<p>My opinion as to what animals should be banned to own by the average person, I believe that all constricting snakes, such as pythons, + boas, as well as all poisonous snakes should NOT be allowed to be kept in a home. I also believe that all of these type of snakes, as well as gila monsters, or any other poisonous reptiles should not be kept by any average person at home.</p>
<p>The ONLY persons that should be allowed to have these dangerous animals is a herpetologist, a zoo, or a person that milks a snake for it&#8217;s venom, to make<br />
antivenin. The only time that these animals should be kept is under strict rules, + only with a permit. These snakes have NO reason to be in someone&#8217;s home, under ANY circumstances. They should always be in appropriate secure facility to guarantee prevention of escape.</p>
<p>As to protecting the environment from all foreign animals, if the paperwork was kept as for where, these animals go, + if to a pet shop, the paperwork should also reflect who purchased the animal, so that if the animal is found loose, it will be proof of the owner releasing the animal, + then that owner should be held accountable, + severely fined. If they can afford to purchase such an animal, they can afford the fines, if the animal causes damage to our environment.</p>
<p>It seems we should give each animal a microchip when it is brought into our country, then it will have a permanent no., so it can be kept track of no matter where in the U.S. that it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OTHER Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-433074</link>
		<dc:creator>The OTHER Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-433074</guid>
		<description>PJ Coombs - Dogs and cats are being &quot;grandfathered in&quot;.  (Probably only because the legislators know how many of their voting constituents are dog and cat owners!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ Coombs - Dogs and cats are being &#8220;grandfathered in&#8221;.  (Probably only because the legislators know how many of their voting constituents are dog and cat owners!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristy B</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-433066</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-433066</guid>
		<description>I have written all of my senators and representatives about this bill.  I did it about 2 weeks ago when I first got wind of it.  I shudder to think what would happen to me and my ferrets if they outlawed them. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written all of my senators and representatives about this bill.  I did it about 2 weeks ago when I first got wind of it.  I shudder to think what would happen to me and my ferrets if they outlawed them. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Coombs</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-432339</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Coombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-432339</guid>
		<description>P.S. Sorry for the typos and such, too early and no coffee.  Let&#039;s stand strong together, no matter what you own for a pet.  Dont you love your pet?  Dont let the government take them away from us.  I could not destroy any of my animals.  I would take the fines and jail time first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. Sorry for the typos and such, too early and no coffee.  Let&#8217;s stand strong together, no matter what you own for a pet.  Dont you love your pet?  Dont let the government take them away from us.  I could not destroy any of my animals.  I would take the fines and jail time first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Coombs</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-432336</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Coombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-432336</guid>
		<description>Come on folks, this bill will effect everyone owning a pet anything!  The manufacturers of animal cagings, supplies, and food will be probably go out of business.  Pet stores, both big chains down to the licensed inhome pet stores, will no longer have animals or supplies to offer to the pet owner.  In turn, will be out of business.  People will be out of a job.  Even the vets will be effected.  Do you really think this wont effect owning a cat or a dog?  Do some research on where your cat or dog&#039;s ancestory line comes from.  Where they here before Columbus landed on the America&#039;s coast?  IF not, then they too are considered to be &quot;nonnative&quot;.  If you have a animal/reptile/fish as a pet, look at what you purchase for them.  All those companies will be effected as well.  Where will you go to provide your animal, that you care so much about, with its food, toys, and medical care?

Yes, we need some restrictions and controls.  Yes there are some real issues out there.  But why should we all be punished because of the carelessness of a few??

Do your part to save our pets.  Please, I love all of ours:  3 UKC registered dogs, 2 cats, 2 different birds, several fresh and saltwater fish, and many reptiles.  We do exhibits edcating as well as breeding a few animals that are close to extinction in hopes of reintroducing some species back into their natural habitat.  Mind you, it was the human that has destroyed the places where some of these animals live.  So what does that say about us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on folks, this bill will effect everyone owning a pet anything!  The manufacturers of animal cagings, supplies, and food will be probably go out of business.  Pet stores, both big chains down to the licensed inhome pet stores, will no longer have animals or supplies to offer to the pet owner.  In turn, will be out of business.  People will be out of a job.  Even the vets will be effected.  Do you really think this wont effect owning a cat or a dog?  Do some research on where your cat or dog&#8217;s ancestory line comes from.  Where they here before Columbus landed on the America&#8217;s coast?  IF not, then they too are considered to be &#8220;nonnative&#8221;.  If you have a animal/reptile/fish as a pet, look at what you purchase for them.  All those companies will be effected as well.  Where will you go to provide your animal, that you care so much about, with its food, toys, and medical care?</p>
<p>Yes, we need some restrictions and controls.  Yes there are some real issues out there.  But why should we all be punished because of the carelessness of a few??</p>
<p>Do your part to save our pets.  Please, I love all of ours:  3 UKC registered dogs, 2 cats, 2 different birds, several fresh and saltwater fish, and many reptiles.  We do exhibits edcating as well as breeding a few animals that are close to extinction in hopes of reintroducing some species back into their natural habitat.  Mind you, it was the human that has destroyed the places where some of these animals live.  So what does that say about us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-428534</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-428534</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen one in many years, but found this tidbit on a National Zoo Fact Sheet:

&quot;Green anoles have a stereotyped set of behaviors. Male anoles perform rituals of dominance and territoriality. They show their dominance by bobbing their heads, usually through pushup-like movements.&quot;

Doesn&#039;t that remind you of some of the guys who showed up at the 9th grade dance without a date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen one in many years, but found this tidbit on a National Zoo Fact Sheet:</p>
<p>&#8220;Green anoles have a stereotyped set of behaviors. Male anoles perform rituals of dominance and territoriality. They show their dominance by bobbing their heads, usually through pushup-like movements.&#8221;</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t that remind you of some of the guys who showed up at the 9th grade dance without a date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. Houlahan</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-428520</link>
		<dc:creator>H. Houlahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-428520</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But I did have an anole (which we all called chameleons, remember?) when I was in junior high. I made it a little leash out of thread, pinned it to my sweater and wore it to school a few times. I’d probably be arrested or at least expelled for doing that these days.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Comment by Susan Fox — April 10, 2009 @ 5:31 pm&lt;/i&gt;

OMFG.  I thought I was the only kid who ever did that.

Eighth grade.  I thought my English teacher (whom I loved) was going to have a coronary when my &quot;jewelry&quot; moved.

I loved that little guy.  I want one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But I did have an anole (which we all called chameleons, remember?) when I was in junior high. I made it a little leash out of thread, pinned it to my sweater and wore it to school a few times. I’d probably be arrested or at least expelled for doing that these days.</i></p>
<p><i>Comment by Susan Fox — April 10, 2009 @ 5:31 pm</i></p>
<p>OMFG.  I thought I was the only kid who ever did that.</p>
<p>Eighth grade.  I thought my English teacher (whom I loved) was going to have a coronary when my &#8220;jewelry&#8221; moved.</p>
<p>I loved that little guy.  I want one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-428515</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-428515</guid>
		<description>Here are the species that are exempt:

&quot;any &lt;strong&gt;cat &lt;/strong&gt;(Felis catus), cattle or oxen (Bos taurus), chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus), &lt;strong&gt;dog&lt;/strong&gt; (Canis lupus familiaris), donkey or ass (Equus asinus), domesticated members of the family Anatidae (geese), duck (domesticated Anas spp.), goat (Capra aegagrus hircus), &lt;strong&gt;goldfish&lt;/strong&gt; (Carassius auratus auratus),horse (Equus caballus), llama (Lama glama), mule or hinny (Equus caballus x E. asinus), pig or hog (Sus scrofa domestica), domesticated varieties of &lt;strong&gt;rabbit&lt;/strong&gt; (Oryctolagus cuniculus), or sheep (Ovis aries)....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the species that are exempt:</p>
<p>&#8220;any <strong>cat </strong>(Felis catus), cattle or oxen (Bos taurus), chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus), <strong>dog</strong> (Canis lupus familiaris), donkey or ass (Equus asinus), domesticated members of the family Anatidae (geese), duck (domesticated Anas spp.), goat (Capra aegagrus hircus), <strong>goldfish</strong> (Carassius auratus auratus),horse (Equus caballus), llama (Lama glama), mule or hinny (Equus caballus x E. asinus), pig or hog (Sus scrofa domestica), domesticated varieties of <strong>rabbit</strong> (Oryctolagus cuniculus), or sheep (Ovis aries)&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-428508</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-428508</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It merely directs the Secretary of the interior to draw up a list of approved animals based on current scientific data. &lt;/i&gt;

First of all, lovely selective quoting to include dogs and cats when we&#039;ve repeatedly said they&#039;re not impacted by this.

The second part, Gina already said. Read the bill. Creating a &quot;guilty until proven innocent&quot; list is exactly what I&#039;m objecting to here. It&#039;s bad law, and it&#039;s bad science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It merely directs the Secretary of the interior to draw up a list of approved animals based on current scientific data. </i></p>
<p>First of all, lovely selective quoting to include dogs and cats when we&#8217;ve repeatedly said they&#8217;re not impacted by this.</p>
<p>The second part, Gina already said. Read the bill. Creating a &#8220;guilty until proven innocent&#8221; list is exactly what I&#8217;m objecting to here. It&#8217;s bad law, and it&#8217;s bad science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Spadafori</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2009/04/10/proposed-federal-law/comment-page-1/#comment-428477</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Spadafori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=6335#comment-428477</guid>
		<description>Read the bill. Doesn&#039;t matter its intentions: Read the bill. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the bill. Doesn&#8217;t matter its intentions: Read the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
