<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dog toy recalled: About time, folks!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/</link>
	<description>Blogging by a team of pet-care experts led by Dr. Marty Becker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:06:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saint Lover</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-342756</link>
		<dc:creator>Saint Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=2817#comment-342756</guid>
		<description>Its about darn time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its about darn time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-342696</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=2817#comment-342696</guid>
		<description>Raises some interesting questions about when the first report of babies being injured was, whether it was before or after the sale of the company&#039;s assets - who knew what and when they knew it.

With 900,000 bassinets out there you could have a lot of very expensive lawsuits.  Juries react strongly to the death of children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raises some interesting questions about when the first report of babies being injured was, whether it was before or after the sale of the company&#8217;s assets - who knew what and when they knew it.</p>
<p>With 900,000 bassinets out there you could have a lot of very expensive lawsuits.  Juries react strongly to the death of children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Spadafori</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-342629</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Spadafori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=2817#comment-342629</guid>
		<description>Mary, I have no doubt you&#039;re right, that legal liability factored into the decision. So now, instead of &quot;just&quot; getting sued, they&#039;re going to get sued AND get lots of bad PR as heartless SOBs. 

Doesn&#039;t seem like a good deal to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary, I have no doubt you&#8217;re right, that legal liability factored into the decision. So now, instead of &#8220;just&#8221; getting sued, they&#8217;re going to get sued AND get lots of bad PR as heartless SOBs. </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t seem like a good deal to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-342621</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=2817#comment-342621</guid>
		<description>When you buy a company, one of the things you factor in is Good Will.  That has value and buyers pay for it.  Why on earth would you buy and up and running company and not keep and enhance the good will.  To not do so is just bad business.  When people refuse to do business with you - you lose it all - money and good will.  Good Will is like honor - blow it and you can never recover it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you buy a company, one of the things you factor in is Good Will.  That has value and buyers pay for it.  Why on earth would you buy and up and running company and not keep and enhance the good will.  To not do so is just bad business.  When people refuse to do business with you - you lose it all - money and good will.  Good Will is like honor - blow it and you can never recover it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikken</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-342619</link>
		<dc:creator>mikken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=2817#comment-342619</guid>
		<description>Did they only recall it because of the internet exposure that Chai&#039;s story was getting?  Because if so, that makes them look a bit like jerks who only care about PR, and not about safety...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they only recall it because of the internet exposure that Chai&#8217;s story was getting?  Because if so, that makes them look a bit like jerks who only care about PR, and not about safety&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-342605</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=2817#comment-342605</guid>
		<description>I think SFCA, the new company, is probably refusing to take responsibility for fear of litigation.  If they were to issue a recall, they may feel that infers liability to them.   I bet their lawyers have told them not to do anything that might be interpreted as acceptance of liability/responsibility on their part.  They are no doubt claiming that responsibility lies with the previous company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think SFCA, the new company, is probably refusing to take responsibility for fear of litigation.  If they were to issue a recall, they may feel that infers liability to them.   I bet their lawyers have told them not to do anything that might be interpreted as acceptance of liability/responsibility on their part.  They are no doubt claiming that responsibility lies with the previous company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian Koeneman</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2008/08/29/dog-toy-recalled-about-time-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-342545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian Koeneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/?p=2817#comment-342545</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for posting this. It&#039;s so sad what happened to poor Chai. Sad and senseless since the company knew about it and didn&#039;t take action. (it happened to another dog a few years ago with the same toy). Four Paws, Inc. is owned by Central Pet Company which owns many brands including Nylabone. 

I personally won&#039;t be buying anymore products from these companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for posting this. It&#8217;s so sad what happened to poor Chai. Sad and senseless since the company knew about it and didn&#8217;t take action. (it happened to another dog a few years ago with the same toy). Four Paws, Inc. is owned by Central Pet Company which owns many brands including Nylabone. </p>
<p>I personally won&#8217;t be buying anymore products from these companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
