Do you like this story?

Electronic training and more from the blogs

August 30, 2007

Share on Facebook Tweet this Google Buzz Digg It Share on technorati Stumble upon it Add to delicious

To be honest, I have no philosophical problem with electronic collars, when they’re used appropriately by people who understand why and how they work. These collars are training tools, something to pull out of a trainer’s tool box to address specific problems.

One example of a specific problem: A dog who won’t quit chasing livestock or killing chickens. Predation is not only a problem for the animals being chased and possibly killed, but the behavior can also be a death sentence for the dog involved. A dog who won’t leave other animals alone may find himself in need of a new home, or may be shot (legally) by a farmer or rancher if the animal gets off his own property and chases someone else’s livestock.

In cases such as these, an electronic collar used by an experienced trainer can change a bad situation.

What I have is an issue with the reality of electronic training. The widespread, ill-informed and unsupervised use of electronic training devices– especially electronic containment systems — is just something I don’t like to see. That makes a handful of companies really unhappy, since I won’t recommend their products to most people, including a new electronic containment system — for cats!  (Electronic collars on cats? People! Just say no!)

Good fences make good doggies, and it’s even possible to put up cat-fencing, too, if you want your indoor cat to have access to the outdoors and won’t consider adding a screened porch or cat enclosure.

Over on A Dog’s Life, dog-trainer Nancy Freedman-Smith writes about a dog who’s likely learning to be aggressive within his electronic containment system — and scaring the bejeebers out of everyone who walks down the street:

Apparently this family just lets the dog out the front door and the she runs the invisible fence line most of the day. This is a recipe for disaster. Not only is the dog practicing unwanted OCD behaviors all day, but one of these days I can guarantee she will charge the wrong dog. Dogs out walking do not understand that the other dogs have invisible boundaries. If the dog on the electric fence gets zapped, over time she will make bad associations with approaching dogs and people, and it will lead to aggression. Notice I didn’t say can, but in this case, I met a time bomb. Legally I am pretty sure that the dog is on city property and technically breaking the leash law.

To make matters worse, she lives on a corner lot!

Had we approached from the other angle and had that dog come running around the corner at us at full speed, as she always does, there may have been a serious dog fight.

Here’s the entire post. For another take on the subject, Dr. Patty Khuly offers up this article from her archives.

Over on Your Pet’s Best Friend, Dr. Everett Mobley mumbles something he regrets while with a client and then writes about it. The resulting post is yet another argument for good, real fences.

Finally, Dr. K (who also has an MBA — the girl knows business!) muses about the growing influence of chains in veterinary medicine — why it’s happening, and what it means for veterinarians, pet-owners and pets. While you’re over there, tell her congrats for providing NPR with a commentary on the Vick situation. Yay!

Filed under: animals: pets — Gina Spadafori @ 6:15 am

2 Comments »

  1. Electronic collars have their place and as you have ststed, they can be lifesavers for dogs chasing livestock, farm equipment or a hunting dog that may stray into danger etc… There are people who use them to teach dogs to fear rattlesnakes, another life saving endeavor.
    But they are often used so very very incorrectly. I know of dogs that have been shocked repeatedly to teach them basic sit and down commands! They wind up terrified or fearful of the people doing the training. Iknow of at least one who was left unpredictable and deranged after a training session that was akin to torture. IMO the collar correction should never be associated( by the dog at least) with human beings. Used correctly to break dangerous habits it ought to seem like the act, not a person, caused the negative event. Training with electronic devices should be most often left to professionals with a proven track record of getting the desired result with these devices while causing the mimimum amount of discomfort to the dog. The average pet owner should stay well clear of shock or E-collars

    Comment by Jennifer J — August 30, 2007 @ 10:14 am

  2. The home we purchased in WA had an invisible fence in place with a small dog unit for the previous owner’s Maltese. We had the original company check the unit and we went through the “training” with our Maltese. Even got shocked so I’d know what she felt. She avoided the 6’ current radius around the buried wire and all went well until the day she spotted a stray cat on “her” property. We yelled commands but she bolted, got hit with a shock and sat down, now being hit with a continuous shock. In this instance, it was faster to run and grab her (and get shocked too) than shut off the unit! But what if we hadn’t seen her? We removed the unit.

    These units may work better with some breeds. There is a good reason you won’t find many Maltese at obedience trials. Most of them become instantly deaf and dumb when they want to, no matter how much training they are given!

    Comment by MaineMom — August 30, 2007 @ 4:01 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment


Syndication

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts