When my deerhound Raven was diagnosed with bone cancer, I knew it was a battle we’d ultimately lose. The number of dogs who go into genuine remission from osteosarcoma is very small. But she was young and strong, and, well, I loved her. So we fought.
I’ve never regretted amputating her leg, because despite the dire predictions of many people, unless a dog already only has three legs, he or she will probably do fine after the surgery. Raven did; she was running up and down stairs before her staples came out.
After the surgery, we began an aggressive course of chemotherapy, and I also took her to a holistic veterinarian for supportive care. Every night Raven jumped up onto my bed and slept next to me. And every morning she opened her eyes, her face lit up and her tail thumped, and she gave me a big kiss.
We only had four and a half months. It cost me $14,000. She died nearly two years ago, and I’m still paying off her vet bill.
I’m also still paying off the $10,000 I spent trying to save my dog Bran from acute renal failure three years ago. I first cashed in my 401(k), and then borrowed on my charge card and then from family, to take him for dialysis at UC Davis. But he was only four years old, and you know — I loved him, too.
In the current issue of Newsweek, Frederick R. Lynch tells about his fight to save his cat, Fritz:
I recently paid $11,000 in veterinary bills for my cat, Fritz. I’ve been hesitant to tell friends about this expenditure, which I know seems extravagant. But after hearing a radio financial guru answer questions from two callers about tapping their 401(k) accounts for veterinary bills, I realized I am not alone.
[....]
Fritz’s rear left leg was amputated at a California veterinary cancer center. The cost was about $4,300. He rebounded just fine, only to be struck two months later by severe pancreatitis—a potentially lethal affliction that required extensive diagnostic tests and a one-week stay in intensive care. He also needed round-the-clock medications—including an expensive anti-emetic drug originally developed for humans undergoing chemotherapy. The bill was $3,250. A second, less severe attack two months later cost an additional $1,250, and follow-up visits and medications racked up $2,200.
“That’s what credit cards are for,” I said when preauthorizing treatment. But an agent from my bank called the day after Fritz came home. “Is this ‘veterinary services’ charge for real?” he asked.
[....]
I admit sometimes questioning the reality of spending $11,000 on my cat when there are greater human needs. I am fully aware that Fritz is not a person. But I have to believe that as a society, we’re a long way from 17th-century French philosopher René Descartes, who claimed that animals have no right to humane treatment because they have no souls. Today, I’m one of many who think that higher mammals are self-conscious, spiritual creatures.
Do I have doubts about Fritz’s extensive, expensive treatments? Sometimes—mainly insofar as they caused him pain. But as I watch him romp around the house, those doubts fade and should dissolve altogether if, in October, we beat that 600-day average prognosis.
I wasn’t so lucky with Bran, who I lost after a ten-day battle. Raven didn’t even make it to the six months most dogs get with amputation alone, let along the year they get with chemo. If I’d known Bran’s ten-day fight would end in death, I’d have put him down the minute he started to suffer. But it wouldn’t have had anything to do with the money, it would have been about the quality of his last days.
And I’d fork over $14,000 tomorrow with a smile on my face to have Raven back again.
So I guess, as the headline on Lynch’s story reads, for some things, no price is too high.