<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dogs boycott cats. Film at 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/</link>
	<description>Blogging by a team of pet-care experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-100976</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-100976</guid>
		<description>I find it curious that those who vehemently oppose being told what they can/cannot do with their cats and dogs are so very willing to tell journalist (the ones in a position to HELP their cause!) who they can/cannot listen to at a public event. Different rules, eh?

HSUS has been a sponsor of both CWA and DWAA events for several years--this isn&#039;t something new. And as a CWA and DWAA member I do not have to like what an individual believes and preaches, and I can attend this event even if I disagree with speaker choice or platform. 

Because if I am to cover the issues in a professional manner, I am ethically required to listen to as many sides/positions as possible and then report those facts as best I am able.

Otherwise, it&#039;s an editorial at best and propaganda at worst and neither serve the greater good of cats and dogs or the people who love them.

Better thank the cat-gods there are pro-writers willing to take the flack to spread the message about this nasty bill. Only facts tear down the &quot;bad stuff&quot; not hearsay--and muzzling cat writers (or dog writers) is IMO mis-guided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it curious that those who vehemently oppose being told what they can/cannot do with their cats and dogs are so very willing to tell journalist (the ones in a position to HELP their cause!) who they can/cannot listen to at a public event. Different rules, eh?</p>
<p>HSUS has been a sponsor of both CWA and DWAA events for several years&#8212;this isn&#8217;t something new. And as a CWA and DWAA member I do not have to like what an individual believes and preaches, and I can attend this event even if I disagree with speaker choice or platform. </p>
<p>Because if I am to cover the issues in a professional manner, I am ethically required to listen to as many sides/positions as possible and then report those facts as best I am able.</p>
<p>Otherwise, it&#8217;s an editorial at best and propaganda at worst and neither serve the greater good of cats and dogs or the people who love them.</p>
<p>Better thank the cat-gods there are pro-writers willing to take the flack to spread the message about this nasty bill. Only facts tear down the &#8220;bad stuff&#8221; not hearsay&#8212;and muzzling cat writers (or dog writers) is IMO mis-guided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine Shacter</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99968</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine Shacter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99968</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree that Wayne Pacelle should not be given a respectable platform from which to spew his venom. I also think that the American Kennel Club and the Westminster Kennel Club did the fancy a terrible disservice when they permitted Pedigree to spew the nonsense about all these &quot;good dogs&quot; who just need to go home without anything being said about our conscientious breeders who work to improve their breeds so each of us can enjoy responsible pet ownership and the viewing public can watch Westminster Kennel Club. This has got to stop. I have the following suggestions:

1. Write to AKC and tell them to support the sport of purebred dogs.

2. Write to Westminster Kennel Club and tell them to support the sport of purebred dogs.

3. Don&#039;t buy Pedigree products. Frankly, I wouldn&#039;t feed my dog that food entirely apart from their support of the HSUS line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree that Wayne Pacelle should not be given a respectable platform from which to spew his venom. I also think that the American Kennel Club and the Westminster Kennel Club did the fancy a terrible disservice when they permitted Pedigree to spew the nonsense about all these &#8220;good dogs&#8221; who just need to go home without anything being said about our conscientious breeders who work to improve their breeds so each of us can enjoy responsible pet ownership and the viewing public can watch Westminster Kennel Club. This has got to stop. I have the following suggestions:</p>
<p>1. Write to AKC and tell them to support the sport of purebred dogs.</p>
<p>2. Write to Westminster Kennel Club and tell them to support the sport of purebred dogs.</p>
<p>3. Don&#8217;t buy Pedigree products. Frankly, I wouldn&#8217;t feed my dog that food entirely apart from their support of the HSUS line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurella Desborough</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99444</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurella Desborough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99444</guid>
		<description>Gina said: 

Quote: Because the members aren’t stupid, and because all sides might take away something valuable. end quote.

Whether or not the members are stupid is not the question...the question is WHY would any pro-animal organization place an ANTI-animal person in a keynote speaker position? 

On a panel discussion...maybe.
As a keynote speaker...nope.

Now, you think both sides will take away something valuable? I believe there is NOTHING that any animal owner or lover could say that would change Wayne Pacelle&#039;s mind about anything re animals...he is an ideologue and his actions are dedicated towards ending pet ownership and all animal contact. 

Laurella Desborough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gina said: </p>
<p>Quote: Because the members aren’t stupid, and because all sides might take away something valuable. end quote.</p>
<p>Whether or not the members are stupid is not the question&#8230;the question is WHY would any pro-animal organization place an ANTI-animal person in a keynote speaker position? </p>
<p>On a panel discussion&#8230;maybe.<br />
As a keynote speaker&#8230;nope.</p>
<p>Now, you think both sides will take away something valuable? I believe there is NOTHING that any animal owner or lover could say that would change Wayne Pacelle&#8217;s mind about anything re animals&#8230;he is an ideologue and his actions are dedicated towards ending pet ownership and all animal contact. </p>
<p>Laurella Desborough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Crosby</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99369</guid>
		<description>As a member of DWAA I am relieved that they will no participate in the idiocy of Mr. Pacelle.  HSUS has, as an admitted goal, the ending of all pet ownership.  Through their support of PeTA and thereby ALF, etc., HSUS supports violence against humans and animals, and funds domestic terrorism.  The CWA should be ashamed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of DWAA I am relieved that they will no participate in the idiocy of Mr. Pacelle.  HSUS has, as an admitted goal, the ending of all pet ownership.  Through their support of PeTA and thereby ALF, etc., HSUS supports violence against humans and animals, and funds domestic terrorism.  The CWA should be ashamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99335</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99335</guid>
		<description>Although, Other Pat, I agree with you that his contribution would be more potentially helpful on a discussion panel.

Comment by Gina Spadafori

IMHO, that would be tantamount to having a discussion with Hitler. Wayne Pacelle and the HSUS take millions from the pet loving public and, after paying enormous salaries to HSUS top execs, use that money to promote bills that will end pet ownership and animals in zoos, research, food, etc. 

I&#039;m sick of their rhetoric. If they really cared, they would educate PEOPLE and offer free spaying and neutering to people that can&#039;t afford it. Not slap our hands and take away our pets like bad children. 

The only way a Wayne Pacelle lecture would be interesting would be if he disclosed the back scene manipulating of politics in this country. The HSUS is using their millions to &quot;support&quot; candidates that support their position on the extinction of animals in captivity as we know them. 

I am angry, and, at the same time, scared, that a lunatic fringe powerful organization, such as HSUS and PETA, have the power to &quot;pick&quot; our elected officials based on their single myopic viewpoint.

It is very scary indeed. And, to me, the organizers of the group that arranged for him to speak have betrayed their members. 

If Wayne had his way, we&#039;d be reading this on nopetconnection.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although, Other Pat, I agree with you that his contribution would be more potentially helpful on a discussion panel.</p>
<p>Comment by Gina Spadafori</p>
<p>IMHO, that would be tantamount to having a discussion with Hitler. Wayne Pacelle and the HSUS take millions from the pet loving public and, after paying enormous salaries to HSUS top execs, use that money to promote bills that will end pet ownership and animals in zoos, research, food, etc. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sick of their rhetoric. If they really cared, they would educate PEOPLE and offer free spaying and neutering to people that can&#8217;t afford it. Not slap our hands and take away our pets like bad children. </p>
<p>The only way a Wayne Pacelle lecture would be interesting would be if he disclosed the back scene manipulating of politics in this country. The HSUS is using their millions to &#8220;support&#8221; candidates that support their position on the extinction of animals in captivity as we know them. </p>
<p>I am angry, and, at the same time, scared, that a lunatic fringe powerful organization, such as HSUS and PETA, have the power to &#8220;pick&#8221; our elected officials based on their single myopic viewpoint.</p>
<p>It is very scary indeed. And, to me, the organizers of the group that arranged for him to speak have betrayed their members. </p>
<p>If Wayne had his way, we&#8217;d be reading this on nopetconnection.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Spadafori</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99269</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Spadafori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99269</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Laurella said:&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;Why invite the enemy to speak to the members?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because the members aren&#039;t stupid, and because all sides might take away something valuable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although, Other Pat, I agree with you that his contribution would be more potentially helpful on a discussion panel.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurella said:<br />
>Why invite the enemy to speak to the members?</p>
<p>Because the members aren&#8217;t stupid, and because all sides might take away something valuable.</p>
<p>Although, Other Pat, I agree with you that his contribution would be more potentially helpful on a discussion panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OTHER Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99262</link>
		<dc:creator>The OTHER Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99262</guid>
		<description>While keeping an open mind to opposing viewpoints is a noble aspiration, I don&#039;t think the appropriate forum to do that in is via an invited keynote speaker.  Generally, such an invitation implies that the inviting organization has some level of agreement with/approval of that speaker&#039;s public positions.  Does CWA really want to create the impression that they - as an organization - approve of HSUS&#039;s anti-pets animal rights agenda?

If CWA really felt they needed to give Wayne Pacelle a platform from which he could espouse his and HSUS&#039; views, a more appropriate approach would have been some sort of a &quot;discussion panel&quot; on which they could also put counterweights - someone who is a spokesman for animal welfare to offset the extremist animal rights agendas being pushed by such organizations as HSUS and PETa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While keeping an open mind to opposing viewpoints is a noble aspiration, I don&#8217;t think the appropriate forum to do that in is via an invited keynote speaker.  Generally, such an invitation implies that the inviting organization has some level of agreement with/approval of that speaker&#8217;s public positions.  Does CWA really want to create the impression that they - as an organization - approve of HSUS&#8217;s anti-pets animal rights agenda?</p>
<p>If CWA really felt they needed to give Wayne Pacelle a platform from which he could espouse his and HSUS&#8217; views, a more appropriate approach would have been some sort of a &#8220;discussion panel&#8221; on which they could also put counterweights - someone who is a spokesman for animal welfare to offset the extremist animal rights agendas being pushed by such organizations as HSUS and PETa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurella Desborough</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99241</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurella Desborough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99241</guid>
		<description>I find it hard to believe that ANY animal related organization with members who care about their ability to own, keep or breed animals or work in any way with animals, including writing about them, would invite Wayne Pacelle of HSUS to speak to their membership at a conference. 

This is the man who continuously advocates AGAINST  the ownership of pets, whose organization funds millions to lobby for restrictive and prohibitive legislation on all animal activities at the state and federal level. This man is NOT a friend to cats, cat owners OR to writers about cats!

Check out www.consumerfreedom.com or www.activist cash.com for more info on Wayne Pacelle of the HSUS...enemy of cats and dogs.

Why invite the enemy to speak to the members?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to believe that ANY animal related organization with members who care about their ability to own, keep or breed animals or work in any way with animals, including writing about them, would invite Wayne Pacelle of HSUS to speak to their membership at a conference. </p>
<p>This is the man who continuously advocates AGAINST  the ownership of pets, whose organization funds millions to lobby for restrictive and prohibitive legislation on all animal activities at the state and federal level. This man is NOT a friend to cats, cat owners OR to writers about cats!</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.consumerfreedom.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.consumerfreedom.com</a> or <a href="http://www.activist" rel="nofollow">http://www.activist</a> cash.com for more info on Wayne Pacelle of the HSUS&#8230;enemy of cats and dogs.</p>
<p>Why invite the enemy to speak to the members?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LH</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99129</link>
		<dc:creator>LH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99129</guid>
		<description>Is CWA smoking some cat nip?!  We&#039;ve heard what Wayne Pacelle has to say and it isn&#039;t in support of our cats/dogs or us. After listening to Wayne and his animal rights friends for many years now, I don&#039;t understand how anyone who loves animals could &#039;invite&#039; him to address such a group.  I&#039;m with DWAA in thinking this is like inviting the snake into the hen house.  Wake up CWA! Why don&#039;t you instead invite someone who fought for your right to own those cats you love in California and who defeated this Trojan Horse of a bill? That&#039;s the people you should be listening to, NOT Wayne Pacelle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is CWA smoking some cat nip?!  We&#8217;ve heard what Wayne Pacelle has to say and it isn&#8217;t in support of our cats/dogs or us. After listening to Wayne and his animal rights friends for many years now, I don&#8217;t understand how anyone who loves animals could &#8216;invite&#8217; him to address such a group.  I&#8217;m with DWAA in thinking this is like inviting the snake into the hen house.  Wake up CWA! Why don&#8217;t you instead invite someone who fought for your right to own those cats you love in California and who defeated this Trojan Horse of a bill? That&#8217;s the people you should be listening to, NOT Wayne Pacelle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/comment-page-1/#comment-99111</link>
		<dc:creator>George Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/07/26/dogs-boycott-cats-film-at-11/#comment-99111</guid>
		<description>Send a message. Don&#039;t attend CWA conference.

They will take away your pets.

The meat from your tables.

The animals in the zoo.

No hunting or fishing.

Pacelle heads the largest animal rights organization in the world, HSUS.  They are not a shelter, while most folks think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send a message. Don&#8217;t attend CWA conference.</p>
<p>They will take away your pets.</p>
<p>The meat from your tables.</p>
<p>The animals in the zoo.</p>
<p>No hunting or fishing.</p>
<p>Pacelle heads the largest animal rights organization in the world, HSUS.  They are not a shelter, while most folks think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

