<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pet food recall: And now, Purina joins the recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/</link>
	<description>Blogging by a team of pet-care experts led by Dr. Marty Becker.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:59:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The OTHER Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-278267</link>
		<dc:creator>The OTHER Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-278267</guid>
		<description>Yup.  Kidding&#039;R&#039;Us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Kidding&#8217;R&#8217;Us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slt</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-278250</link>
		<dc:creator>slt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-278250</guid>
		<description>Joy - I was only having a little light hearted fun with Pat&#039;s comment because I see her on this board all the time and I like her.  I added the &quot;winky smiley face&quot; to make it clear to anyone who might not know me that I was only joking.  She seemed to take it in the manner I intended and posted a comment to kid me back.  I don&#039;t see any rudeness anywhere but if it made you feel offended in some way, please know that was not my intention and I&#039;m sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joy - I was only having a little light hearted fun with Pat&#8217;s comment because I see her on this board all the time and I like her.  I added the &#8220;winky smiley face&#8221; to make it clear to anyone who might not know me that I was only joking.  She seemed to take it in the manner I intended and posted a comment to kid me back.  I don&#8217;t see any rudeness anywhere but if it made you feel offended in some way, please know that was not my intention and I&#8217;m sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OTHER Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-278217</link>
		<dc:creator>The OTHER Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-278217</guid>
		<description>Where? 8-\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where? 8-\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-278101</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-278101</guid>
		<description>rudeness :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rudeness :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OTHER Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-278049</link>
		<dc:creator>The OTHER Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-278049</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t quit your day job . . . . . . .

(tee.  hee.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t quit your day job . . . . . . .</p>
<p>(tee.  hee.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slt</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-277946</link>
		<dc:creator>slt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-277946</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t think he&#039;s been checking in daily to see if anyone challenged his claims?  Today is that day!  ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s been checking in daily to see if anyone challenged his claims?  Today is that day!  ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OTHER Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-277938</link>
		<dc:creator>The OTHER Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-277938</guid>
		<description>Elijah&#039;s post is from July of 2007 - almost a year ago.  I doubt you&#039;ll get a response at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elijah&#8217;s post is from July of 2007 - almost a year ago.  I doubt you&#8217;ll get a response at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol V</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-277930</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-277930</guid>
		<description>I too would like to see the source of those stats---as I have/had 2 of those 3/10,000 in my own in a very small town in a very small state!  Melamine tested positive in the food and acute renal failure in the vet records....and no &quot;courtesy&quot; reimbursement for my vet bills....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too would like to see the source of those stats&#8212;-as I have/had 2 of those 3/10,000 in my own in a very small town in a very small state!  Melamine tested positive in the food and acute renal failure in the vet records&#8230;.and no &#8220;courtesy&#8221; reimbursement for my vet bills&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-277921</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-277921</guid>
		<description>Elijah said: 

&quot;However, 99% of these illnesses have no relation to contaminated food. Pets get sick and this is an easy way out to blame someone due to the timing of recalls. Only 3 in 10,000 pets have been diagnosed with renal failure due to melamine contamination. The pet food industry is paying out many claims that are in no relation to the food - as a courtesy.&quot;

Elijah, from where are you gathering these &quot;statistics&quot;?  The FDA reported 10,000 sick/dead pets (and that&#039;s just the FDA&#039;s numbers)...but even if it were &quot;only&quot; 10,000, where did you learn that only 3 of those were related to the tainted pet food?    

Are you honestly convinced the pet food industry is paying out 24 million in claims as a &quot;courtesy&quot;?  That&#039;s a lot of money for simple courteousness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elijah said: </p>
<p>&#8220;However, 99% of these illnesses have no relation to contaminated food. Pets get sick and this is an easy way out to blame someone due to the timing of recalls. Only 3 in 10,000 pets have been diagnosed with renal failure due to melamine contamination. The pet food industry is paying out many claims that are in no relation to the food - as a courtesy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Elijah, from where are you gathering these &#8220;statistics&#8221;?  The FDA reported 10,000 sick/dead pets (and that&#8217;s just the FDA&#8217;s numbers)&#8230;but even if it were &#8220;only&#8221; 10,000, where did you learn that only 3 of those were related to the tainted pet food?    </p>
<p>Are you honestly convinced the pet food industry is paying out 24 million in claims as a &#8220;courtesy&#8221;?  That&#8217;s a lot of money for simple courteousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desiree</title>
		<link>http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/comment-page-4/#comment-277324</link>
		<dc:creator>Desiree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2007/03/31/pet-food-recall-and-now-purina-joins-the-recall/#comment-277324</guid>
		<description>I have an eight moonth old beagle and she has been eating Purina puppy chow. I have heard from a sibling that Purina puppy chow makes dogs lose their fur. I would like t know if that is true. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an eight moonth old beagle and she has been eating Purina puppy chow. I have heard from a sibling that Purina puppy chow makes dogs lose their fur. I would like t know if that is true. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
