Dogmobiles: Road-testing the Land Rover L3
By Gina Spadafori
November 29, 2006
After you’ve been driving a vehicle a while, you get a sense of the person it has been designed for. Soccer moms, of course, and then richer soccer moms and soccer moms who don’t want to look like soccer moms. Twenty-something snowboarders/skateboarders/mountain bikers. Guys who want everyone to know that they are NOT poorly endowed, just look at the size of this, um, SUV. And then, of course, there are middle-aged single-women with dogs, like … uh … me.
After a few days driving the Land Rover L3, I knew exactly who the target audience was:
Dick Cheney.
In other words, it’s the perfect vacation home vehicle for someone older, rich and powerful, who expects luxury, demands toughness and is fully prepared to push everyone else the bloody hell out of his way. The Land Rover L3 (test model at a tick over $56K) even has a Cheney-esque sneer on its face, in the way it brings up the hallogen headlights with a look of sheer superiority. And in how it packs in all its luxuries — navigation system, alpaca-trimmed heated leather seats and more — with grudging contempt for anyone who’d want them. Listen up, wimps! I’m a serious off-roader with a grand Imperial tradition. You want heated seats? Fine! But you’re going to get sixteen different ways to get over that snow-covered ridge, you got that, pal?!
The L3 is a pretty flawless as an upscale dogmobile, although if your dog’s an older one you’ll need a ramp to get him up into it, because the off-road chops means this SUV’s pretty darn high off the ground. (As for people, well, let me just say don’t try to get into that alpaca butt warmer if you’re wearing a long, slender skirt. You can’t, without some inelegant hiking and exhibitionism.) The tailgate is the two-part kind I love, with the glass flipping up and the tailgate flipping down. Seats fold flat, there’s ample cargo room for the muddy hunting dog a fellow with 6,000 acres of well-stocked Montana hunting land would surely have. (Hey, if it’s good enough for the Queen’s corgis, it’s good enough for the Veep’s hunting hounds, no?)
Pretty perfect rich-guy dogmobile all around, except for one little problem: The yellow button.
On the center console are many of the buttons having to do with various four-wheel options one never faces in most of California, such as driving through snow storms. Smack dab in the middle of the cluster is a yellow button that puts the vehicle into cliff-climbing mode. Great if you’re in an action adventure movie, and you’ve just woken up from being drugged to discover your back wheels are at the edge of a crumbling cliff. If that’s your case, no worries! Push the yellow button and the forces of good are trumphant! You’re on your way to a happy ending!
But, be driving down a suburban boulevard when your beautiful, wimpy little Sheltie steps on the yellow button and you may end up tail-ended. We were not, but just because of pure dumb luck. The Land Rover rolled its shoulders, cracked its knuckles and shifted rapidly down into cliff-climbing mode, a move that involved a 30 mph drop in speed. In other words, OH MY GOD! Why they put this there, I have no idea. Maybe your friends and family aren’t as nosy than mine, but I can honestly imagine most of them saying “what’s THIS for?” and pushing the thing. (Hello, Sonia!)
Bottom line: Got a ranch in Montana, a cliff to climb, an extra $60K or you’re in line for the English throne or a top GOP office, you’ll love the Land Rover L3, and the dogs will, too. But whatever you do, DON’T TOUCH THE YELLOW BUTTON!

Best dog mobile review ever and a good laugh to.
We wouldn’t be alive with the yellow button -for very long!
Nancy
Comment by nancy — November 29, 2006 @ 2:50 pm
And here I was worried about a young dog finding that alpaca-trimmed leather to be a mighty fine chew toy!
Comment by kabbage — November 30, 2006 @ 12:31 am
I had a dog who rode with front feet on the console between front seats and hind feet in the back seat, her body between the two front seats of my Z28 Camaro. The yellow button would have been a problem! The dog I have now likes to stay firmly in the back seat. The next one—who knows?
I had one dog who hated the front so much that when I tried to get him to ride there when the back was full of groceries, he climbed in the back anyway, to the detriment of the groceries. I get the feeling the front seat of a Z28 Camaro is not that comfortable for a big dog. My short-bodied boy of the same breed preferred that seat, though.
The Land Rover looks like it would be impossible for someone like me with rheumatoid arthritis to get in and out of on bad days. Also, looking at the profile from the back, I shudder to think what it would be like to drive when the Oklahoma wind is 30 mph or so. The 20 to 30 mph range is common here, and we’re short on trees to block it. We actually had a weather warning recently to park your cars facing a certain direction so the wind wouldn’t blow doors off when you opened them.
I’m going to keep dreaming about that yellow Toyotamobile! It might be a worthy successor to my 1980 Z280—if I can ever bear to part with it.
—-Kathy Diamond Davis
Comment by Kathy Diamond Davis — November 30, 2006 @ 2:48 am
LOL! I still drool over this as a replacement for the late, great Discovery ;)
Comment by KT — December 8, 2006 @ 3:23 pm
[…] Cupholders are dog-conveniently placed in the middle between the seats, but at least not any of the window controls are. McKenzie can try to sneak a sip of latte without changing gears or opening a window, and for that, I’m grateful. […]
Pingback by Pet Connection Blog » Dogmobiles: Road-testing the Kia Sorento — January 14, 2007 @ 12:53 pm
[…] One potention problem that isn’t: Althought the dreaded yellow button from the Land Rover is in the Range Rover, too, also sitting in the middle of the center console, it was positioned immediately in front of the arm rest, which meant little risk of a dog stepping on it and causing an accident. Yay! […]
Pingback by Pet Connection Blog » Dogmobiles: Road-testing the Range-Rover and the Jeep Liberty — February 2, 2007 @ 11:54 am