Dogmobiles: Road-testing the Nissan Murano

November 5, 2006

Murano
Does anybody really use these pretty, upscale SUVs for doing anything except impressing other people and hauling 1.7 kids to soccer? I mean, really, what good is having a vehicle that appears designed for hauling things if there isn’t any room for putting things in it?

Case in point: The Nissan Murano (although it’s certainly not the only vehicle with such problems). The Murano looks nice, with its aerodynamically clean, round lines (although honestly, its rear end over-emphasizes my own, making it a vehicle that makes my butt look big). And you can’t fault it on comfort, at least not in the tricked-out upgraded version I’ve been test-driving. Handling seems a little on the wallowy side, somewhere between the sportiness of a cross-over like the Acura RDX and the smoothness of a land yacht like tthe Volvo XC90.

As someone who has lived in Sacramento almost her life, I can tell you there’s little virtue in being halfway: We’re always touted as being “halfway to everywhere” — San Francisco, Tahoe, the wine country, etc. — but what that really means is that we’re nowhere at all, and that’s what the Murano felt like to me. It’s a vehicle that doesn’t handle as sharply as some, and isn’t as smooth as others. Still, it’s a comfortable and attractive vehicle, reasonable priced for its luxuries ($42,500 for the all-bling model I drove) with decent if not impressive fuel economy (19/24).

OK, but here’s my beef: The cargo space is not particularly conducive to hauling of safely crated dogs. Plus for the Murano: Dropping the seats was terrifically easy, and the folded seats were flat as Kansas.

But … my one big crate wouldn’t fit vertically, although there is enough horizontal room for the smaller side-by-sides to fit … sort of. With the Murano’s sloping rear hatch, I had to push the one side-by-side I did end up using up against the front seats to get the hatch to close. (That old square peg and round hole problem I first encountered in the otherwise sublime RAV-4.) The image shows the problem — rounded spaces, square crates. Next.

Finally verdict: Not a bad vehicle, by any means, but not a great dogmobile.

Next up: The Toyota FJ Cruiser, which is promoted as a real off-roader. I’m taking it to hunt test, so that capability should be tested a little.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
Filed under: animals: pets, dogcars.com, dogmobiles — Gina Spadafori @ 8:58 am

3 Comments »

  1. “Does anybody really use these pretty, upscale SUVs for doing anything except impressing other people and hauling 1.7 kids to soccer?”

    Yes. 2.0 ridgebacks and enough luggage for 2 notorious over-packers, comfortably :)

    “Handling seems a little on the wallowy side, somewhere between the sportiness of a cross-over like the Acura RDX and the smoothness of a land yacht like tthe Volvo XC90.”

    Personal preference, I’m sure, but I’d take the Murano any day over the stiff and unmanagable Volvo.

    Of course … at our house, we still dream of the Range Rover and the Porsche Cayenne

    Comment by KT — November 5, 2006 @ 1:02 pm

  2. I know you like yours. The difference in space is the crates. I know your dogs don’t use them. Mine do.

    Comment by Gina — November 5, 2006 @ 3:47 pm

  3. Heh ;) I did forget to mention the one thing that I truly hate about the Murano … its blind spots! I still long for my Discovery which was like a fish bowl. The Murano resembles a WWII bunker … small peek holes!

    And yeah … I know. They should be in crates. I’m a bad mom!

    Comment by KT — November 5, 2006 @ 5:11 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Syndication

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Web services by Black Dog Studios