Dogmobiles: Road-testing the Nissan Murano
By Gina Spadafori
November 5, 2006

Does anybody really use these pretty, upscale SUVs for doing anything except impressing other people and hauling 1.7 kids to soccer? I mean, really, what good is having a vehicle that appears designed for hauling things if there isn’t any room for putting things in it?
Case in point: The Nissan Murano (although it’s certainly not the only vehicle with such problems). The Murano looks nice, with its aerodynamically clean, round lines (although honestly, its rear end over-emphasizes my own, making it a vehicle that makes my butt look big). And you can’t fault it on comfort, at least not in the tricked-out upgraded version I’ve been test-driving. Handling seems a little on the wallowy side, somewhere between the sportiness of a cross-over like the Acura RDX and the smoothness of a land yacht like tthe Volvo XC90.
As someone who has lived in Sacramento almost her life, I can tell you there’s little virtue in being halfway: We’re always touted as being “halfway to everywhere” — San Francisco, Tahoe, the wine country, etc. — but what that really means is that we’re nowhere at all, and that’s what the Murano felt like to me. It’s a vehicle that doesn’t handle as sharply as some, and isn’t as smooth as others. Still, it’s a comfortable and attractive vehicle, reasonable priced for its luxuries ($42,500 for the all-bling model I drove) with decent if not impressive fuel economy (19/24).
OK, but here’s my beef: The cargo space is not particularly conducive to hauling of safely crated dogs. Plus for the Murano: Dropping the seats was terrifically easy, and the folded seats were flat as Kansas.
But … my one big crate wouldn’t fit vertically, although there is enough horizontal room for the smaller side-by-sides to fit … sort of. With the Murano’s sloping rear hatch, I had to push the one side-by-side I did end up using up against the front seats to get the hatch to close. (That old square peg and round hole problem I first encountered in the otherwise sublime RAV-4.) The image shows the problem — rounded spaces, square crates. Next.
Finally verdict: Not a bad vehicle, by any means, but not a great dogmobile.
Next up: The Toyota FJ Cruiser, which is promoted as a real off-roader. I’m taking it to hunt test, so that capability should be tested a little.

“Does anybody really use these pretty, upscale SUVs for doing anything except impressing other people and hauling 1.7 kids to soccer?”
Yes. 2.0 ridgebacks and enough luggage for 2 notorious over-packers, comfortably :)
“Handling seems a little on the wallowy side, somewhere between the sportiness of a cross-over like the Acura RDX and the smoothness of a land yacht like tthe Volvo XC90.”
Personal preference, I’m sure, but I’d take the Murano any day over the stiff and unmanagable Volvo.
Of course … at our house, we still dream of the Range Rover and the Porsche Cayenne
Comment by KT — November 5, 2006 @ 1:02 pm
I know you like yours. The difference in space is the crates. I know your dogs don’t use them. Mine do.
Comment by Gina — November 5, 2006 @ 3:47 pm
Heh ;) I did forget to mention the one thing that I truly hate about the Murano … its blind spots! I still long for my Discovery which was like a fish bowl. The Murano resembles a WWII bunker … small peek holes!
And yeah … I know. They should be in crates. I’m a bad mom!
Comment by KT — November 5, 2006 @ 5:11 pm